General National Id Sweden_01 Site name Tullstorpsån Light or indepth? In-depth The in-depth description of the case study cs-se-01-final_version.pdf NUTS Code Sydsverige RBD code SE4 Transboundary 0 Data provider Martyn Futter SLU Source(s) www.tullstorpsan.se NWRM(s) implemented in the case study Re-meandering Buffer strips and hedges Riverbed material renaturalization Wetland restoration and management Longitude 13.7666 Latitude 56.2 Site information Climate zone cool temperate moist Mean annual rainfall 300 - 600 mm Mean rainfall unit mm/year Average temperature 6 Mean runoff unit 450 - 600 mm Average runoff coefficient 0,5 Average imperviousness 0,00999999977648258 Type Case Study Info Mean annual runoff range 300 - 450 mm Average slope range 1-2% Vegetation class arable agriculture Design & implementations Application scale River Basin Area (ha) 57400 Design contractual arrangement Arrangement type Responsibility Role Comments Name Design consultation activity Activity stage Key issues Name Comments Design land use change Land use change type Design authority Authority type Role Responsibility Name Comments Private property owners Initiation of the measure Tullstorpsån Economic Association Farmers Initiation of the measure Tullstorpsån Economic Association Other Other Trelleborg Municipality Municipality, supported Tullstorpsån Economic Association Other Financing Government of Sweden Other Financing EU Lessons, risks, implications... Key lessons Riparian land owners, farmers and other stakeholders must be involved in the decision making process if NWRM aimed at restoring the natural water retention capacity of agricultural landscapes are to be successful. Success factor(s) Success factor type Success factor role Comments Attitude of decision makers Attitude of the public Attitude of relevant stakeholders Financing Financing type Comments National funds Other EU funds, not clear as to which funding source Barrier Barrier type Barrier role Comments Driver Driver type Driver role Comments Legal obligations secondary driver WFD and Baltic Sea nutrient reduction commitments Organisation committed to it main driver Financing share Financing share type Share Comments Policy, general governance and design targets Policy target Target purpose Pollutants Removal Improved Biodiversity Oher Societal Benefits Increase Water Storage Policy pressure Pressure directive Relevant pressure Policy area Policy area type Policy area focus Name Comments Policy impact Impact directive Relevant impact Policy wider plan Wider plan type Wider plan focus Name Comments Policy requirement directive Requirement directive Specification Socio-economic Direct benefits information not specified Ancillary benefits information improved social welfare asociated with amenity ecosystem services Costs total 1300000 Information on Ecosystem improved biodiversity improved fish spawning habitat and bird habitat Information on Ecosystem provisioning services not specified Information on Ecosystem impact climate regulation not specified Biophysical impacts Water quality overall improvements Positive impact-WQ improvement Information on Water quality overall improvements design targets for a 30% reduction in N flux and 50% reduciton in P flux from the catchment to the Baltic Sea Full Context Collection(aka Doorway or Gallery) Case Studies Pathway(aka Context) Default view Area(aka Level or Site) ALL